The legal term "Person" - Re: Rights in Equity

| Home |


A 'natural person' is a human being, a member of the class 'the People', and separate legal party from other 'legal person' such as a trust, corporation, or other quasi-corporation such as a government entity in legal body or not-for-profit organization or Non-Government-Organization (NGO) of legal registry.

This is found in Oklahoma Law, Title 22 Section 22-4.

The registry of such entitties is confusing, especially where the place (a land, province, or territory) such as "State of Oklahoma", a region, and a legal organization with accounts themed a form of Trust (corporation) is made to conduct business there also as designated "STATE OF OKLAHOMA".

Likewise, the natural born person, a human being, and the estate created by the 'THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES', an agency of the UNITED STATES, under its right of franchise, may and has created roll accounts for use in INTERSTATE COMMERCE which are styled usually by a 'SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER' (securities enumerator) and a common name - such as the name of the intended user made in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS upon that instrument.

Whereby, in mental health as designated 43A O.S. 43A-5-104 rule, the natural born person may become ill and incapable, they may be removed from the position of 'agency' and 'power of attorney' over the estate granted to them suspended; this legal instrument of a trust in estate law is not by definition their body or person in natural person standing.

This was expressly affirmed eloquently 2019 February by Justice Ruth Ginsburg for the unanimous Supreme Court of the United States in 586 U.S. ____ case 17-1091 formal opinion by Ginsburg.

The use of fines in excess of real earnings to forfeit the estate at law, or to seize its agent in body to satisfy such fines, was ruled EXCESSIVE FINES and a violation of 18 USC 241 rule in the prior case, citing it had binding effect since 1868 and was and always will be under such rule an overreach and excessive use of powers not granted to the UNITED STATES nor any member State in any civil procedure.

It is therefore not only incorrect, but a misdemeanor (43A O.S. 43A-5-104) to make record of any kind or claim of any medical class or basis, that the citation of the 'natural person' being distinct and separate from the 'incorporated estate' created at law by a civil court, nor to regard to XXIII-8 and XXIII-9 rule of Article XXIII in the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma which prohibits certain injury to the 'natural person' also set forth in 76 O.S. 76-1, 76-6, and 76-8 rule of Title 76, regarding the civil rights of persons (natural and incorporated) against taking for perpetual concealment of a child on no legal cause, on no evidence made record, and in claim of no inhernet rights (76 O.S. 76-1) by STATE OF TEXAS against JAMES ALLEN and the agent of that estate - "James Allen".

Such actions are clearly felonies (18 USC 241 and 242), and as such, per 22 O.S. 22-31 and 22-32 rule, is such notice refused public acknowledgement as answer obligated 45 CFR 302.56(c) and 302.56(f) a right and duty of the agent for "serious injury" defined in 18 USC 1589 rule.

Further, is the threat against persons with 'information' as witnesses in the case made by the "187 Group" afford to JAMES ALLEN the rights reserved in 22 O.S. 22-33, to lend aid and sustain privacy and conceal the location of such witnesses and their activity from harm and incitement of violence made upon the 187 web page to aid in child abduction and child concealment contrary an order of 'possession' to return such child to JAMES ALLEN - refused by STATE OF TEXAS on all lawful notice and with demnd for money conditional such rights not afforded the civil court of such State.

STATE OF TEXAS is sustaining a retaliation themed harassment in 200 counts, violating TEXAS FAMILY CODE section 157.261 rule of "final judgment" limiting such claim to $500.00 USD (five hundred United States Dollars); and language in definition of BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY in such contract, themed an ex parte order #01-17702-R, which confess "DISCHARGE" of such "CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION" in full; including the prior debt, a met condition of law due to the incompetence and use of language by STATE OF TEXAS in the order constituting an unlimited and unlawful SECURITY INSTRUMENT issued against the exercise and for sale of the 76 O.S. 76-8 rights of JAMES ALLEN and the agent of that estate; in fraud to embezzle from the Treasury of the UNITED STATES funds under 45 CFR 302.0 an 303.0 rule; contrary 45 CFR 303.6 limit discharging all right to seek enforcement against JAMES ALLEN for any claim.

The UNITED STATES, in FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244, stated at law the policy prohibiting this abuse was in effect since 1991. Further, that such law was explicit in 15 U.S.C. 1673(c) and 28 U.S.C. 1738A(e) rule; and so also did the Oklahoma Supreme Court rule this "automatic mistrial" with no loss of rights to JAMES ALLEN for failure to admit evidence and refusal of evidence and right to appear while his opponent was in 2001 upon multiple appearances "wholly in default" as recorded in December 2001; confessing 23 O.S. 23-9.1 subsection D class III "spoliation" themed a felony under 18 USC 2071 rule as INTERSTATE COMMERCE was then made a factor in claims to and before the UNITED STATES to falsely promote this forfeiture; so confessed in 2018-2020 in written letters of threat barred at law by the prior Supreme Court 9-0 rule; and voiding such debt per 15 USC 1692d rule.

Per 588 U.S. ____ case 17-647, the STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA, and also the UNITED STATES, as legal persons - are then subject 18 USC 1593 "mandatory restitution" for injury in this case; and protections in 21 O.S. 21-748.2 rule including right to speedy trial in civil counter-claim not afforded by 14 month delay in case FR-18-04 before PONTOTOC COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, further evidence of violation of 18 USC 3161 Federal Law and Oklahoma Constitution Article II section II-6 rule; a felony per 18 USC 241 and 242 again in two counts.

Effort to confuse the public as to the "STATE OF TEXAS" and "State of Texas" language created by the court and denied standing to obliterate the rights of the agent to bondage before and by design of the State not a legal form of civil pecuniary fine; are further evidence of the "BLACK CODES" cited by Ginsburg in 586 U.S. ____ case 17-1091; and proof of criminal conspiracy against "The Laws of the United States" subject 18 USC 2383 and 2384 rule - immediate defense so themed a "public danger" voiding normal immunity of AMENDMENT V rights in the Constitution of the United States.

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF TEXAS, and UNITED STATES employees appear in full liability to be engaged in suppression of these 22 O.S. 22-31 rights, protections, and Constitutional provisions voiding such contract "by operation of law", and thereby subject to complaint in 18 USC 2383 and immediate relief set forth in common law per 76 O.S. 76-9 rule; to include notice that they have "abandoned their public office, and in doing so vacated their authority at law in disbarrment by official act a felony prohibited at law subject immediate relief of legal authority in the remaining registered officer of the UNITED STATES present - JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN, on behalf of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION "RACCOON TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED" - a Schedule C Corporation and legal person named in threats in this matter also and so registred in 2009 in STATE OF OKLAHOMA as a foreign agent of the UNITED STATES resident at 130 N COUNTRY CLUB RD, ADA OKLAHOMA 74820, at law.

In attacks upon a registred UNITED STATES agent, and in actions intent on the detainment and restriction of the normal and ordinary INTERSTATE COMMERCE by taking, concealment, and detention for $39,000 USD in immediate funds and $95,500 USD in false title transfer impacting $423 million USD in documented book asset transferrs, is the PETERSEN v ALLEN case now a matter of record in evidence of fraud under title IV $28.3 billion USD grant not met by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, and UNITED STATES so set forth at law in 45 CFR 302.0 and 303.0 rule; its deadlines made known in public register FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244 on December 16 2016; and fraud themed $566 billion USD over 2001-2020.

The legal person, James Allen, as agent of that estate and natural born person; so subjected to abuse of clear design to forfeit such public office and public trust; alerts the parties to this matter in Article I section I-1 and Article II section II-1 rule; the powers reserved to the legal person of the People and available then to James Allen as the injured party - in their full authority and for the class - against such incorporated estate which claims to be their agent in perfidy prohibited by GENERAL ORDER NUMBER 1 (The Lieber Code), and that the UNITED STATES be estopped by this pledge, and doubly so by its ratification of "CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA" in 1907 and of "THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE", that it is so obligated without statutory limit or statutory law what-so-ever to act pursuant to the Supreme Law clause of Article I section I-1 in the arrest, punishment, end to such injury - and to the protection cited in Article II section II-1.

No provision of trial or due process is afforded those legal parties, by agreement of the prior rule, obligating only punishment; and such parties having separated themselves from the People and created as incorporated 'legal persons' any institution to delay or deny punishment as would violate Oklahoma constitution Article II section II-6 rule; be void and full and complete remedy the duty notwithstanding all other claims of indemnity or immunity; set forth in rule of the UNITED STATES per 586 U.S. ____ case 17-1091 and 588 U.S. ____ case 17-647 formal opinion of the high court for the Supreme Law of the Land.

We may shed a legal person (corporation) such as UNITED STATES or STATE OF TEXAS, and void its standing and assets and registration, as well as that of its Registered Members as a class; where by design (TEXAS FAMILY CODE 157.008) they have conspired to violate the Cosntitution of the United States or "Constitution of the State of Oklahoma" in PETERSEN v ALLEN; and their terriotry (State of Texas) remain a property of the People not subject to that class as would the "United States" be so a property of the People cited also in Oklahoma Constitution Article I section I-1, contrary any modification (II-1) or dissolution (II-1) of the UNITED STATES as a legal person.

This "American" body politic exists not-withstanding the legal body UNITED STATES or its Congress, and such Congress (in 1907) did accept these terms and are so estopped from dissent, lest it be in breach of its public office and of the contract for use of authority in Public Trust; for which it is not authorized at any time since 1907 to claim as "Sovereign" in legal defense (used, GREG ABBOTT, in PETERSEN v ALLEN prior class action MARK BITARA et al v UNITED STATES) to escape these rights and protections themed in violation EXCESSIVE FINES and "GENOCIDE" by direct act, by plan, and by complicity from 2001 August 11th to 2020 present.

A people who do not recognize their own reserved and enumerated right of Sovereignty are slaves to a legal person who denies it exists in their absence and representation; as has the UNITED STATES wrongly themed this matter and STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA conspired to decline the CHOICE OF LAW set in public agreement "THE UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT (Rev 2008)", whereby they as legal persons were obligated to "satisfaction of all obligations" in 01-17702-R, not merely the financial fees they sought for creation of a false bond or security on the body of James Allen, with express act to create in the removal of civil honors confessed in written form by the COMMISSIONER FOR INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA in 2017 a form of "peonage" and sustained withholding of a child during ordered "possession" and in suspension of "inherent rights" themed a public offense (76 O.S. 76-8) against the person of James Allen and Magnus Vincent Petersen, in 18 USC 241 and 242 felony violation of law.

These rules further affirmed in 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(9) "operation of law" and binding law in all Fifty States to the "final judgement" made July 1 2002 for $500.00 USD; and to the DISCHARGE rule of this order; and to the 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(10) rule which OBLIGATED such claims be MODIFIED TO 25% OF FEDERAL TAX RETURN rather than sustained without legal cost and payments to the COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS or its registered members and TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION; so made express in 45 CFR 302.56(f) and 302.56(g) rule - a violation of the legal obligation of any Title IV agent or agency, which 588 U.S. ____ 17-647 then places solely upon the STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA in joint liability a conspriacy against rights not permitted at law; having no duty or obligation or proof due by JAMES ALLEN to escape this fraud - a theft of the identity of the estate in INTERSTATE COMMERCE suggested, directed, and aided by employees of the UNITED STATES and TITLE IV agency Director "HOWARD H. HENDRICK" and "RENEE BANKS".

Unlimited damages in 23 O.S. 23-9.1 subesction D class III may include any property of similar standing as that which was taken of equitable register, such as the PATENT AND TRADEMARK REGISTRATION by sequenced serial number of all residence of the states at law who participated in this fraud; as such abuse themed a XXXIII-1A violation of OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO WORK pertained taking and dilution of the registered property "BEYOND WAR" by employees of a foreign government, a patent registry in competition with the company in the PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, and to damage the property themed a $423 million asset in false sale during 2018-2020 in transfer of a similar product to SOUTH KOREA during this harassment in FR-18-04 action, PONTOTOC COUNTY, STATE OF OKALHOMA, on a false debt not having standing in 42 USC 666(a)(9) rule, "fully paid" if not "automatically void" at law by operation of the record and complaint prior filed in formal notice repeatedly. Evidence of which and destruction of that destroyed remark made by the UNITED STATES officer in the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION in written letter so filed also, a clear 18 USC 2071 violation and felony; affording this resitance lawful cause set also in TEXAS FAMILY CODE 157.375 rule (immunity from all civil process) and from felony charge in Oklahoma Law (22 O.S. 22-31, who may resist)

A simple reading of Blacks Law Dictionary and instrument 01-17702-R reveals the fraud is express on paper, filed as evidence, and confession of an unlimited and illegal security instrument per 15 USC 1692g rule, so void.

The right of return of hostages, and of the parent-child bond to the Oklahoma parent, is evident in KELLY v KELLY (P100, 2007) a legal matter of standing, and violation of 76 O.S. 76-8 rule; a right themed inherent which the STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA did deny upon record, to create a fraud subject such serious forfeiture as the 'PATENT AND TRADEMARK REGISTRY', all dividents themed TITLE IV per "Flemming v Nestor, 1960" styling those as assets of the UNITED STATES for forfeiture in full and not deposits of any other legal person with claim; and so also the rights and claims of any foreign patent or copyright enjoined with the United States Treaty "THE BERNE CONVENTION" with any country so enjoined by property to the parties making threats and claims in PETERSEN v ALLEN.

The effort to delay, stall, and obstruct reunification with an abducted newborn child in 2001-2020 has produced only one result for the UNITED STATES and its Member States: extremely high cost beyond its capacity to pay without suspending the agency over certain powers granted to it which were entailed in motive to abduct; to the extent of potentially disbarring the UNITED STATES and certain member States from legal standing as is the penalty set by the same in 22 USC Chapter 78 rule already law.

This a question of Sovereignty and agency, not 'Citizen' standing and access to the Public Trust, and already 'settled law' per II-1 rule (OK Const) and SCOTUS (586 U.S. ____ case 17-1091) with remedy not limited to the sole appeal of the UNITED STATES as a party (588 U.S. ____ case 17-647) nor assumed by the same, in legal person.

To put this in perspective, a quote from Hollywood fiction seems best:
- Snake Pliskin (Escape from L.A.)


§22-4. Construction of words.
Unless when otherwise provided, words used in this code in the present tense include the future as well as the present. Words used in the masculine comprehend as well the feminine and neuter. The singular number includes the plural, and the plural the singular. And the word person includes a corporation as well as a natural person.
R.L.1910, § 5538.

§22-407. Words, how construed.
The words used in an indictment or information must be construed in their usual acceptation, in common language, except words and phrases defined by law, which are to be construed according to their legal meaning.
R.L.1910, § 5744.

§22-19a. Arrest or charge as result of identity theft - Expungement on motion of court, district attorney or defendant.
Notwithstanding any provision of Section 18 or 19 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes, when a charge is dismissed because the court finds that the defendant has been arrested or charged as a result of the defendant’s name or other identification having been appropriated or used without the defendant’s consent or authorization by another person, the court dismissing the charge may, upon motion of the district attorney or the defendant or upon the court’s own motion, enter an order for expungement of law enforcement and court records relating to the charge. The order shall contain a statement that the dismissal and expungement are ordered pursuant to this section. An order entered pursuant to this section shall be subject to the provisions of subsections D through M of Section 19 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes.
Added by Laws 2004, c. 406, § 2, eff. July 1, 2004.

§22-31. Who may resist.
Lawful resistance to the commission of a public offense may be made:
1. By the party about to be injured.
2. By other parties.
R.L.1910, § 5556.

§22-32. Resistance by party to be injured.
Resistance sufficient to prevent the offense may be made by the party about to be injured:
1. To prevent an offense against his person or his family, or some member thereof.
2. To prevent an illegal attempt, by force, to take or injure property in his lawful possession.
R.L.1910, § 5557.

§22-33. Resistance by other person.
Any other person, in aid or defense of the person about to be injured, may make resistance sufficient to prevent the offense.
R.L.1910, § 5558.


§21-28. Aiding in a misdemeanor.
Whenever an act is declared a misdemeanor, and no punishment for counseling or aiding in the commission of such act is expressly prescribed by law, every person who counsels or aids another in the commission of such act, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and punishable in the same manner as the principal offender.
R.L.1910, § 2799.

Oklahoma Constitution


Contracts waiving benefits of Constitution invalid.
Any provision of a contract, express or implied, made by any person, by which any of the benefits of this Constitution is sought to be waived, shall be null and void.


Notice or demand, stipulation for.
Any provision of any contract or agreement, express or implied, stipulating for notice or demand other than such as may be provided by law, as a condition precedent to establish any claim, demand, or liability, shall be null and void.